You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Some questions need you guys to help answer, thanks in advance!
add fixed margin 44.
have you guys tried other margin values and see if any improvements?
similarity transformation,
have you guys tried other transformations, I noticed that in face_preprocess.py there are some commented code which looks like projective transform.
It looks like the similarity transformed image will gain black corner running test.py, I use the mtcnn crop the testing images, without resizing and fixed 44 margin. I am not sure if this is by design or I am wrong with the cropping steps -:)
mtcnn 5 landmarks
It looks like mtcnn 5 landmarks are not accurate regarding side face, if use more accurate lardmarks, shall it improve the performance?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Face alignment is not the main topic of our current work. We just follow the same pipeline of sphereface: to use 5 landmarks and then do similarity transform. The only difference is we use 112x112 instead of 112x96.
If your original face image is quite tight, black corners are likely to be happened.
We may provide a 3D-alignment library later, which will be much more accurate.
Some questions need you guys to help answer, thanks in advance!
add fixed margin 44
.similarity transformation
,face_preprocess.py
there are some commented code which looks like projective transform.test.py
, I use the mtcnn crop the testing images, without resizing and fixed 44 margin. I am not sure if this is by design or I am wrong with the cropping steps -:)mtcnn 5 landmarks
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: