refactor: Adapt reader benchmarks

[bogdankostic]

Related Issues

• related to Adapt benchmarking script #4902

Related PRs

• depends on refactor: Generate eval result in separate method #5001
• depends on refactor: Adapt benchmarking utils #5003

Proposed Changes:

This PR adapts the reader benchmarking script such that we can simply provide a Pipeline containing a reader and a label file.

How did you test it?

Manual test.

Notes for the reviewer

We use run_batch instead of eval_batch methods as measuring the time of eval isn’t representative for pure inference speed because it creates a significant overhead.

Checklist

• I have read the contributors guidelines and the code of conduct
• I have updated the related issue with new insights and changes
• I added tests that demonstrate the correct behavior of the change
• I've used one of the conventional commit types for my PR title: fix:, feat:, build:, chore:, ci:, docs:, style:, refactor:, perf:, test:.
• I documented my code
• I ran pre-commit hooks and fixed any issue

[coveralls]

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 5088703774

• 0 of 0 changed or added relevant lines in 0 files are covered.
• No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
• Overall coverage remained the same at 39.621%

---

Totals
Change from base Build 5081399763:	0.0%
Covered Lines:	8876
Relevant Lines:	22402

---

💛 - Coveralls

[vblagoje]

LGTM 🚀