You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Unfortunately, we have a bug in the node software, which means that "neutral" votes are counted as a "no".
Cake had also some problems during the last voting rounds, so not all votes were casted. They made it public: https://t.me/CakeDeFi_EN_announcements/814. Thanks for the transparency!
By checking the on-chain governance data as well as the published cake voting data, it is obvious that the DFIP would have been approved without the "count neutral votes as no votes bug". That means, MNs like the idea. Based on that, we will Re-Upload the DFIP for the current round!
AFAIK, the bug will be fixed on-chain, so we will finally get a correct result for the current voting round that will close in the middle of April: https://defiscan.live/blocks/countdown/2860000
Corrected Version
Bernd mentioned that I read the official document from Cake in a wrong way. Sry for that, he is absolutely right. With the additional information delivered by mydefichain, we can also see the results including all Cake Votes. Here is now the final, hopefully correct, table:
So at the end, with all cake votes and without the "neutral" votes, it would be a "yes". Due to that, we will upload it again.
Document published by mydefichain:
Non-obligation
I understand that vote of confidence for DFIP carries no obligations by any developers to implement the proposals. DeFiChain is a community projects. Pull requests can be submitted by community and reserved to be evaluated for safety and general community acceptance.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
DFIP Overview
Describe your proposal
Unfortunately, we have a bug in the node software, which means that "neutral" votes are counted as a "no".
Cake had also some problems during the last voting rounds, so not all votes were casted. They made it public: https://t.me/CakeDeFi_EN_announcements/814. Thanks for the transparency!
By checking the on-chain governance data as well as the published cake voting data, it is obvious that the DFIP would have been approved without the "count neutral votes as no votes bug". That means, MNs like the idea. Based on that, we will Re-Upload the DFIP for the current round!
Initial post--> https://www.reddit.com/r/defiblockchain/comments/10w0npj/dfip_community_fund_diversification/
AFAIK, the bug will be fixed on-chain, so we will finally get a correct result for the current voting round that will close in the middle of April: https://defiscan.live/blocks/countdown/2860000
Corrected Version
Bernd mentioned that I read the official document from Cake in a wrong way. Sry for that, he is absolutely right. With the additional information delivered by mydefichain, we can also see the results including all Cake Votes. Here is now the final, hopefully correct, table:
So at the end, with all cake votes and without the "neutral" votes, it would be a "yes". Due to that, we will upload it again.
Document published by mydefichain:
Non-obligation
I understand that vote of confidence for DFIP carries no obligations by any developers to implement the proposals. DeFiChain is a community projects. Pull requests can be submitted by community and reserved to be evaluated for safety and general community acceptance.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: