Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

test(fs): improve copy() testing #5084

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 20, 2024
Merged

Conversation

kt3k
Copy link
Member

@kt3k kt3k commented Jun 19, 2024

part of #3713

This improves the test coverage of fs/copy.ts.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the fs label Jun 19, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 19, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 92.45%. Comparing base (6c598d5) to head (cc92b54).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #5084      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   92.43%   92.45%   +0.02%     
==========================================
  Files         481      481              
  Lines       38746    38746              
  Branches     5449     5453       +4     
==========================================
+ Hits        35813    35823      +10     
+ Misses       2878     2868      -10     
  Partials       55       55              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@iuioiua iuioiua changed the title test(fs): improve copy testing test(fs): improve copy() testing Jun 19, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@iuioiua iuioiua left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice

@kt3k kt3k merged commit de40243 into denoland:main Jun 20, 2024
16 checks passed
@kt3k kt3k deleted the improve-copy-test branch June 20, 2024 09:58
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants