You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
If relevant, on the same night, all backup exposures from expid=134789 onwards were flagged as "unsure" by the observers in the nightlog.
Besides, these expids=134791-92 were preceded/succeded with backup observations, so conditions might have been variable.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Tileid=21984 has been observed with expids=134791-92 on 20220514.
It has several r- and z-band sky alerts (petals 4-5-6-7-8-9); and a suspicious bgs_faint n(z), despite having nominally ~1.5 more effime than required (efftime=265s):
https://data.desi.lbl.gov/desi/spectro/redux/daily/tiles/cumulative/21984/20220514/tile-qa-21984-thru20220514.png
If relevant, on the same night, all backup exposures from expid=134789 onwards were flagged as "unsure" by the observers in the nightlog.
Besides, these expids=134791-92 were preceded/succeded with backup observations, so conditions might have been variable.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: