Add automatic detekt tasks for Android Plugins #2787

realdadfish · 2020-06-11T15:48:26Z

The Gradle Plugin was missing automatic task generation for Android modules, so I tried adding them.

While this works in general, I still get a couple of compilation issues when running the task on different modules, mainly things that stem from code generation:

/DownloadApiFactory.kt:7:24: error: unresolved reference: BuildConfig
import my.module.BuildConfig
                       ^
/DownloadApiFactory.kt:28:52: error: unresolved reference: BuildConfig
        .client(downloadOkHttpFactory.createClient(BuildConfig.DEBUG, readTimeOutSeconds))

codecov · 2020-06-11T15:57:40Z

Codecov Report

Merging #2787 into master will decrease coverage by 0.20%.
The diff coverage is 51.74%.

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##             master    #2787      +/-   ##
============================================
- Coverage     79.76%   79.56%   -0.21%     
- Complexity     2507     2527      +20     
============================================
  Files           427      431       +4     
  Lines          7542     7639      +97     
  Branches       1421     1441      +20     
============================================
+ Hits           6016     6078      +62     
- Misses          771      795      +24     
- Partials        755      766      +11

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ	Complexity Δ
...tlab/arturbosch/detekt/DetektCreateBaselineTask.kt	`0.00% <0.00%> (ø)`	`0.00 <0.00> (ø)`
...lin/io/gitlab/arturbosch/detekt/KotlinExtension.kt	`0.00% <ø> (ø)`	`0.00 <0.00> (ø)`
.../io/gitlab/arturbosch/detekt/internal/DetektJvm.kt	`0.00% <0.00%> (ø)`	`0.00 <0.00> (?)`
.../gitlab/arturbosch/detekt/internal/FileMangling.kt	`0.00% <0.00%> (ø)`	`0.00 <0.00> (?)`
...o/gitlab/arturbosch/detekt/internal/SharedTasks.kt	`52.17% <52.17%> (ø)`	`0.00 <0.00> (?)`
...gitlab/arturbosch/detekt/internal/DetektAndroid.kt	`70.96% <70.96%> (ø)`	`12.00 <12.00> (?)`
...kotlin/io/gitlab/arturbosch/detekt/DetektPlugin.kt	`83.87% <83.33%> (+30.02%)`	`11.00 <6.00> (+1.00)`
...ab/arturbosch/detekt/extensions/DetektExtension.kt	`47.36% <100.00%> (+22.36%)`	`6.00 <3.00> (+4.00)`
...h/detekt/api/internal/DisabledAutoCorrectConfig.kt	`44.44% <0.00%> (-33.34%)`	`5.00% <0.00%> (-2.00%)`
.../arturbosch/detekt/core/tooling/ParsingStrategy.kt	`27.27% <0.00%> (-11.19%)`	`0.00% <0.00%> (ø%)`
... and 11 more

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 1712c0d...39f36fc. Read the comment docs.

realdadfish · 2020-06-11T16:23:01Z

Hrm... I still seem to be doing something else wrong. When this task is run, my custom rule in my project fails to execute, because it cannot determine the absolute path of the incoming KtFile, i.e. ktFile.getUserData(Key<String>("absolutePath")) returns null. Any idea here?

realdadfish · 2020-06-12T08:42:28Z

I eventually opened https://issuetracker.google.com/issues/158777988 for the BuildConfig issue above, in case I did not oversee anything in the existing AGP 4.0 API how to retrieve the generated source classpath into Detekt.

arturbosch · 2020-06-14T17:11:39Z

Hrm... I still seem to be doing something else wrong. When this task is run, my custom rule in my project fails to execute, because it cannot determine the absolute path of the incoming KtFile, i.e. ktFile.getUserData(Key<String>("absolutePath")) returns null. Any idea here?

Please try to rebase on current master.
We have moved some code for 1.10.0 which running 1.9.1 with newer extensions won't handle.
Does this fix it?

realdadfish · 2020-06-15T08:20:29Z

Build is broken - the new detekt-bom artefact is apparently missing and not published. Working around that.

Could not parse POM /Users/thomaskeller/.m2/repository/io/gitlab/arturbosch/detekt/detekt-gradle-plugin/1.10.0-RC1-android-gradle-plugin/detekt-gradle-plugin-1.10.0-RC1-android-gradle-plugin.pom
            > Could not find io.gitlab.arturbosch.detekt:detekt-bom:1.10.0-RC1-android-gradle-plugin.

It's part of the locally-published POM:

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<project xmlns="http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0" xsi:schemaLocation="http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0 http://maven.apache.org/xsd/maven-4.0.0.xsd" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
  <!-- This module was also published with a richer model, Gradle metadata,  -->
  <!-- which should be used instead. Do not delete the following line which  -->
  <!-- is to indicate to Gradle or any Gradle module metadata file consumer  -->
  <!-- that they should prefer consuming it instead. -->
  <!-- do_not_remove: published-with-gradle-metadata -->
  <modelVersion>4.0.0</modelVersion>
  <groupId>io.gitlab.arturbosch.detekt</groupId>
  <artifactId>detekt-gradle-plugin</artifactId>
  <version>1.10.0-RC1-android-gradle-plugin</version>
  <dependencyManagement>
    <dependencies>
      <dependency>
        <groupId>io.gitlab.arturbosch.detekt</groupId>
        <artifactId>detekt-bom</artifactId>
        <version>1.10.0-RC1-android-gradle-plugin</version>
        <type>pom</type>
        <scope>import</scope>
      </dependency>
    </dependencies>
  </dependencyManagement>
  ...

realdadfish · 2020-06-15T09:49:19Z

Ok, I manually added the missing POM file for detekt-bom and got it working:

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<project xmlns="http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0" xsi:schemaLocation="http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0 http://maven.apache.org/xsd/maven-4.0.0.xsd" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
  <modelVersion>4.0.0</modelVersion>
  <groupId>io.gitlab.arturbosch.detekt</groupId>
  <artifactId>detekt-bom</artifactId>
  <version>1.10.0-RC1</version>
  <name>detekt</name>
  <packaging>pom</packaging>
  <dependencyManagement>
    <dependencies>
      <dependency>
        <groupId>com.beust</groupId>
        <artifactId>jcommander</artifactId>
        <version>1.78</version>
      </dependency>
      <dependency>
        <groupId>org.yaml</groupId>
        <artifactId>snakeyaml</artifactId>
        <version>1.26</version>
      </dependency>
      <dependency>
        <groupId>org.jetbrains.kotlinx</groupId>
        <artifactId>kotlinx-html-jvm</artifactId>
        <version>0.7.1</version>
      </dependency>
    </dependencies>
  </dependencyManagement>
</project>

realdadfish · 2020-06-15T10:33:19Z

Please try to rebase on current master.
We have moved some code for 1.10.0 which running 1.9.1 with newer extensions won't handle.
Does this fix it?

This solved the issue with my custom rule not finding the KtFile's path. Analysis runs through in general, just that I still see a lot of compilation errors beforehand (that don't break the task). I don't know how exactly Detekt's type resolution works, but I guess issues that stem from synthetic imports won't be resolvable, because the compiler plugin generating code for those doesn't place that generated code anywhere visible.

> Task :ui:detektDebug
/BarcodeScannerDialogFragment.kt:24:24: error: unresolved reference: synthetic
import kotlinx.android.synthetic.main.dialog_fragment_barcode_scanner.camera_container

arturbosch · 2020-06-20T19:51:19Z

Ok, I manually added the missing POM file for detekt-bom and got it working:

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<project xmlns="http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0" xsi:schemaLocation="http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0 http://maven.apache.org/xsd/maven-4.0.0.xsd" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
  <modelVersion>4.0.0</modelVersion>
  <groupId>io.gitlab.arturbosch.detekt</groupId>
  <artifactId>detekt-bom</artifactId>
  <version>1.10.0-RC1</version>
  <name>detekt</name>
  <packaging>pom</packaging>
  <dependencyManagement>
    <dependencies>
      <dependency>
        <groupId>com.beust</groupId>
        <artifactId>jcommander</artifactId>
        <version>1.78</version>
      </dependency>
      <dependency>
        <groupId>org.yaml</groupId>
        <artifactId>snakeyaml</artifactId>
        <version>1.26</version>
      </dependency>
      <dependency>
        <groupId>org.jetbrains.kotlinx</groupId>
        <artifactId>kotlinx-html-jvm</artifactId>
        <version>0.7.1</version>
      </dependency>
    </dependencies>
  </dependencyManagement>
</project>

The bom will be published with #2814

detekt-gradle-plugin/build.gradle.kts

detekt-gradle-plugin/src/main/kotlin/io/gitlab/arturbosch/detekt/DetektPlugin.kt

arturbosch

Does android need the synthetic props/files while running detekt or for a sourceset?

Does it help if you explicitly add them to DetektExtension.input?

detekt-gradle-plugin/src/main/kotlin/io/gitlab/arturbosch/detekt/DetektPlugin.kt

realdadfish · 2020-06-22T16:54:48Z

Does android need the synthetic props/files while running detekt or for a sourceset?

Can't think of any, no. Just the source files should be enough IMHO.

realdadfish · 2020-06-22T16:55:41Z

I'll come back to this in a few weeks, right now it's release crunching time here and I have no more time to spent on this PR. I'll keep it open until then and then rebase against the recent master.

realdadfish · 2020-07-15T13:32:14Z

Would be happy if somebody could re-review this. Thanks!

arturbosch

The code looks good to me.
Could you elaborate why we technically need two Gradle plugins to support Android?

Shouldn't project.plugins.withId("kotlin-android") {...} to enough to not run into android specific code?

detekt-gradle-plugin/src/main/kotlin/io/gitlab/arturbosch/detekt/KotlinExtension.kt

realdadfish · 2020-07-15T20:25:55Z

The code looks good to me.
Could you elaborate why we technically need two Gradle plugins to support Android?

Shouldn't project.plugins.withId("kotlin-android") {...} to enough to not run into android specific code?

I'm not sure if I understand the question. The original reviewer's comment was that the Android-specific things should not become a burden for non-Android projects, so no Android-specific dependencies should be in the original plugin's code. I understood that and followed along. I figured however that there was no other easy and maintainable way to query the Android Gradle Plugin's API except for referencing it, the alternative would have be to write a lot of class loading magic.

The other thing is in many projects Android modules and pure JVM modules are intermixed. My aim was to have a single plugin (the new android plugin) to handle both, without code and configuration duplication. That's why I also created those aggregation tasks, detektMain and detektTest, to make it easy to run detekt on a codebase that contained either module type.

realdadfish · 2020-07-15T22:22:55Z

@arturbosch I opened up a separate, experimental sub PR to figure out how feasible it is to generate a baseline file with type resolution enabled, but I stumbled upon a weird issue. Could you comment there? realdadfish#1

realdadfish · 2020-07-16T23:14:49Z

Issue solved in a separate PR here. #2879

realdadfish · 2020-07-16T23:28:20Z

So, the TR-enabled baseline creation is working nicely alongside checking. I will add a couple of more integration tests to check whether the appropriate tasks are actually created once I got some feedback on the implementation.

I kind of "hacked" the configuration of the baseline file and dynamically extend it's name with the sourceSet or variant name. I don't like this approach all too much; the alternative would have been to not configure a single baseline file, but to provide a directory where these files reside (configure module/baselines, plugin reads / writes module/baselines/{main,test,debug,release}.xml, while falling back to a common module/baselines/detekt.xml if the specific baseline file is not found).

Feedback is welcome!

arturbosch · 2020-07-20T13:26:10Z

Issue solved in a separate PR here. #2879

Thanks for the fix!

It will take me some time to review this PR. I will come back to you in a few days.

realdadfish · 2020-08-04T10:52:15Z

@arturbosch Have you had time to look at the PR yet? I'm working with a fork right now and would really like to get this "upstream-ready" :)

arturbosch · 2020-08-04T20:21:51Z

@arturbosch Have you had time to look at the PR yet? I'm working with a fork right now and would really like to get this "upstream-ready" :)

Sorry for the delay. Unfortunately no, not yet. I will take time for this PR this week. Thanks for the reminder and the patience.

arturbosch · 2020-08-09T16:10:57Z

@arturbosch Have you had time to look at the PR yet? I'm working with a fork right now and would really like to get this "upstream-ready" :)

Hey, sorry for the wait!
When trying to build locally I get:

com.android.builder.errors.EvalIssueException: SDK location not found. Define location with an ANDROID_SDK_ROOT environment variable or by setting the sdk.dir path in your project's local properties file at '/tmp/gradle17916022041907269827projectDir/local.properties'.

Any idea why this is happening? I can successfully build ktlint-gradle without needing the android sdk.

arturbosch · 2020-08-09T16:17:30Z

The code looks good to me.
Could you elaborate why we technically need two Gradle plugins to support Android?
Shouldn't project.plugins.withId("kotlin-android") {...} to enough to not run into android specific code?

I'm not sure if I understand the question. The original reviewer's comment was that the Android-specific things should not become a burden for non-Android projects, so no Android-specific dependencies should be in the original plugin's code. I understood that and followed along. I figured however that there was no other easy and maintainable way to query the Android Gradle Plugin's API except for referencing it, the alternative would have be to write a lot of class loading magic.

I meant that if you protect code which uses Android specific methods/references with project.plugins.withId("kotlin-android") {...} it won't crash for non-android users.
I'm sorry that I don't follow now :). Which original comment do you mean?
If we can combine the task generation for plain jvm and android users, we should definitely do this in just one plugin.
Gradle plugin tests are expensive and cost us most of the time in our build.
Having a separation through different files/functions is good enough I would say. The ktlint-gradle plugin proves that this is possible.

realdadfish · 2020-08-09T21:28:07Z

@arturbosch Have you had time to look at the PR yet? I'm working with a fork right now and would really like to get this "upstream-ready" :)

Hey, sorry for the wait!
When trying to build locally I get:
com.android.builder.errors.EvalIssueException: SDK location not found. Define location with an ANDROID_SDK_ROOT environment variable or by setting the sdk.dir path in your project's local properties file at '/tmp/gradle17916022041907269827projectDir/local.properties'.
Any idea why this is happening? I can successfully build ktlint-gradle without needing the android sdk.

Can you give me the full stacktrace? Then I can investigate why the Gradle plugin asks for the SDK at this stage. I don't know the ktlint plugin enough to answer your second question.

realdadfish · 2020-08-09T21:36:26Z

I'm not sure if I understand the question. The original reviewer's comment was that the Android-specific things should not become a burden for non-Android projects, so no Android-specific dependencies should be in the original plugin's code. I understood that and followed along. I figured however that there was no other easy and maintainable way to query the Android Gradle Plugin's API except for referencing it, the alternative would have be to write a lot of class loading magic.

I meant that if you protect code which uses Android specific methods/references with project.plugins.withId("kotlin-android") {...} it won't crash for non-android users.

Ok, had to re-read on class-loading, because my original assumption was that if I want to be truly "compatible" I'd have to use a lot of reflection in my code, but apparently popular JVMs have some loopholes and it might be enough to move the Android-specific code in separate classes, eventually even only into a separate method (cf. https://stackoverflow.com/a/34263422/305532). I try to come up with a better solution then.

I'm sorry that I don't follow now :). Which original comment do you mean?

It was given by schalkms on the Kotlin Slack at #detekt:

The detekt-gradle-plugin is the wrong place to do it. A detekt user with a web app doesn't want to depend on Android stuff.
Thanks for the contribution! I think this should be done in a separate module if the community wants to maintain this stuff.

If we can combine the task generation for plain jvm and android users, we should definitely do this in just one plugin.
Gradle plugin tests are expensive and cost us most of the time in our build.

Well, the amount of tests would stay the same if I'd merge both, but in any case one could speed up the tests in-module with parallelism (higher fork-count) eventually if this is an issue.

Having a separation through different files/functions is good enough I would say. The ktlint-gradle plugin proves that this is possible.

Again, don't know the innards of ktlint-gradle, but I try my best.

realdadfish · 2020-08-20T11:20:03Z

@arturbosch I rebased to current master and merged the implementation back into the main plugin. Let me know what you think.

realdadfish · 2020-08-20T11:26:22Z

If this is ready for prime-time, I should probably document the configuration options and meta tasks / potential pitfalls as well as the configuration file fallback somewhere. What would be a good place to do so?

BraisGabin · 2020-08-20T12:13:05Z

If this is ready for prime-time, I should probably document the configuration options and meta tasks / potential pitfalls as well as the configuration file fallback somewhere. What would be a good place to do so?

I suppose that here is the best place: https://github.com/detekt/detekt/blob/master/docs/pages/gettingstarted/gradle.md if it gets big we can split it later.

arturbosch · 2020-08-23T10:36:50Z

The code looks good. @BraisGabin can you check how it behaves with one of your Android projects, please?
I'm not sure how to handle the warnings about missing generated files on the classpath as many of our users do not want to see any output on the console / or disturbing warnings :/
These warnings appear when using detekt[SourceSet/Variant] only?

realdadfish · 2020-08-24T20:04:47Z

@arturbosch These warnings appear only for detekt<Variant>, yes, they won't appear on detekt<SourceSet> on JVM modules.

Things to note: detektMain and detektTest, as well as detektBaselineMain and detektBaselineTest tasks are proxy tasks that can be called to check and eventually create baseline files for all main and all test variants of a module.

Baseline files are recognized by source set or variant name, while the latter takes precedence. That means if both, a <baseline-name>-main.xml and a <baseline>.xml exist in a JVM module, the first is used for main source sets and the latter for test source sets. Likewise, if a <baseline-name>-<variant>.xml exists, it takes precendence for the detekt<Variant> and detektBaseline<Variant> tasks before <baseline-name>.xml (if that exists).

realdadfish · 2020-08-24T21:18:40Z

I've added some documentation to gradle.md here: https://github.com/detekt/detekt/blob/f125d511cc5ce4a537f9946e943e89e66bdd2060/docs/pages/gettingstarted/gradle.md

BraisGabin · 2020-08-25T10:24:17Z

TL;DR: Ready to merge.

I did a quick fix to make it compile. But I'm not sure if I could break something (I know nearly nothing about gradle scriptting)

Things that I found:

A lot of warnings like:

Ignoring a file detekt cannot handle: /Users/brais.gabin/projects/XXXXX/file.java

If I run ./gradlew detekt it doesn't check the flavor/buildType source sets nor the tests. (I didn't check androidTest but I suppose that it will be the same)
I have 2 flavors so detekt finds nearly all the issues twice because nearly all the code is in main. This have sense... but if we find an way to remove duplicates would be great.

Neigther of those seem like blockers. I think that this is a huge improvement.

We can mark the support to Android as "experimental" so we can break things when we get some feedback from the community.

realdadfish · 2020-08-25T11:20:25Z

If I run ./gradlew detekt it doesn't check the flavor/buildType source sets nor the tests. (I didn't check androidTest but I suppose that it will be the same)

Yes, the detekt task wasn't and isn't used at all for Android - I could only add this as another "proxy" to run detekt<AllSourceSetsOrVariants> in the background, but frankly, I didn't want to confuse user's expectations what this task then would do (TR-enabled checking) than what the regular detekt task would do on a non-Android project (non-TR-enabled checking).

I have 2 flavors so detekt finds nearly all the issues twice because nearly all the code is in main. This have sense... but if we find an way to remove duplicates would be great.

This is a hard problem, because each analysis sees basically "two different versions" of the same module. What I could think about in general however is some kind of "merge" task, similar to what Jacoco also provides for it's binary format. We'd however have to separate analysis from report generation task-wise, and I don't know how feasible this is to do right now, given the fact that the development goes towards a compiler plugin.

BraisGabin · 2020-08-25T12:47:46Z

I have a lot of false positives in the rule IgnoredReturnValue... All of them related with RxJava3 (that have sense, because RxJava uses the @CheckReturnValue annotation). I don't know if this is an issue with the rule itself or the plugin. I feel strange that no one opened an issue about this if the problem is the rule.

Then I have false positives in UnnecessarySafeCall related with the missing classes. For example:

binding.address2?.visibility = if (state.address == null) GONE else VISIBLE

The problem is that binding is a generated class so detekt can't know if address2 is or not nullable.

I really don't know if these issues are in the plugin, my setup or the rules.

realdadfish · 2020-08-25T13:13:04Z

@BraisGabin I've recently upgraded to Rx3 (3.0.6) as well and got no additional warnings from Detekt wrt IgnoredReturnValue. Interesting...

Regarding databinding (this is databinding, and not synthetic accessors, right?), we don't use safe-calls on those, so we don't see those warnings there either.

BraisGabin · 2020-08-25T14:18:46Z

@BraisGabin I've recently upgraded to Rx3 (3.0.6) as well and got no additional warnings from Detekt wrt IgnoredReturnValue. Interesting...

Yes... probably a problem in my setup? I have issues in code like:

Observable.just("hi")
  .observeOn(main) // This line
  .subscribe()
  .addTo(compositeDisposable)

or

return if (something) {
  Observable.just("hi") // this line
} else {
  Observable.just("hello") // and this line too
}

Regarding databinding (this is databinding, and not synthetic accessors, right?), we don't use safe-calls on those, so we don't see those warnings there either.

It is ViewBinding. With a layout for mobile/tablet with some missing views in the mobile.

But I'm wondering how detekt should behave about this errors... Manage the case that one class is not correctly solved in the rule doesn't seem rule-writter friendly... So maybe we should just don't care about it. This will be fixed with the compile plugin so add that complexity to the rules doesn't seem a good idea.

arturbosch · 2020-08-25T15:49:32Z

Cool :) lets merge this then, looks good @realdadfish thanks for the contribution!

BraisGabin · 2020-08-25T16:49:54Z

🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉 Great contribution @realdadfish

realdadfish force-pushed the gradle-plugin-android branch from 3bb75c7 to 28f758d Compare June 15, 2020 07:40

arturbosch reviewed Jun 20, 2020

View reviewed changes

detekt-gradle-plugin/build.gradle.kts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

arturbosch reviewed Jun 20, 2020

View reviewed changes

detekt-gradle-plugin/src/main/kotlin/io/gitlab/arturbosch/detekt/DetektPlugin.kt Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

arturbosch reviewed Jun 20, 2020

View reviewed changes

detekt-gradle-plugin/src/main/kotlin/io/gitlab/arturbosch/detekt/DetektPlugin.kt Show resolved Hide resolved

realdadfish force-pushed the gradle-plugin-android branch from 2efb6a5 to 4c2b53b Compare July 14, 2020 15:11

arturbosch reviewed Jul 15, 2020

View reviewed changes

detekt-gradle-plugin/src/main/kotlin/io/gitlab/arturbosch/detekt/KotlinExtension.kt Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

realdadfish mentioned this pull request Jul 15, 2020

Detekt Baseline with Type Resolution realdadfish/detekt#1

Merged

realdadfish force-pushed the gradle-plugin-android branch from a42e70c to 1bb3e69 Compare August 20, 2020 11:19

realdadfish force-pushed the gradle-plugin-android branch from 1bb3e69 to 0c139e3 Compare August 20, 2020 11:22

realdadfish force-pushed the gradle-plugin-android branch from 0c139e3 to 9c8c213 Compare August 20, 2020 21:20

BraisGabin mentioned this pull request Aug 20, 2020

Rules with mixed behavior based on Type resolution #2994

Closed

15 tasks

realdadfish force-pushed the gradle-plugin-android branch from 9c8c213 to 53ccca8 Compare August 24, 2020 20:27

Add automatic detekt tasks for Android Plugins

f408a96

realdadfish force-pushed the gradle-plugin-android branch from 53ccca8 to f408a96 Compare August 24, 2020 20:30

realdadfish changed the title ~~WIP: Add automatic detekt tasks for Android Plugins~~ Add automatic detekt tasks for Android Plugins Aug 24, 2020

Describe the changes in the Detekt Gradle Plugin

f125d51

Fix a merge issue

39f36fc

arturbosch added this to the 1.12.0 milestone Aug 25, 2020

arturbosch approved these changes Aug 25, 2020

View reviewed changes

arturbosch merged commit 5e03bd9 into detekt:master Aug 25, 2020

arturbosch mentioned this pull request Aug 25, 2020

Run Gradle Android tests conditionally when sdk path is defined #3014

Merged

realdadfish deleted the gradle-plugin-android branch August 27, 2020 10:58

chao2zhang mentioned this pull request Mar 3, 2021

Applying Detekt from external Gradle file fails with: Unable to load class 'com.android.build.gradle.BaseExtension' #3490

Closed

chao2zhang mentioned this pull request Jul 28, 2021

Baseline path works only for baseline generation #3985

Closed

Add automatic detekt tasks for Android Plugins #2787

Add automatic detekt tasks for Android Plugins #2787

Conversation

realdadfish commented Jun 11, 2020

codecov bot commented Jun 11, 2020 • edited Loading

Codecov Report

realdadfish commented Jun 11, 2020

realdadfish commented Jun 12, 2020

arturbosch commented Jun 14, 2020

realdadfish commented Jun 15, 2020 • edited Loading

realdadfish commented Jun 15, 2020

realdadfish commented Jun 15, 2020

arturbosch commented Jun 20, 2020

arturbosch left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

realdadfish commented Jun 22, 2020

realdadfish commented Jun 22, 2020

realdadfish commented Jul 15, 2020

arturbosch left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

realdadfish commented Jul 15, 2020

realdadfish commented Jul 15, 2020

realdadfish commented Jul 16, 2020

realdadfish commented Jul 16, 2020

arturbosch commented Jul 20, 2020

realdadfish commented Aug 4, 2020

arturbosch commented Aug 4, 2020 • edited Loading

arturbosch commented Aug 9, 2020 • edited Loading

arturbosch commented Aug 9, 2020

realdadfish commented Aug 9, 2020

realdadfish commented Aug 9, 2020 • edited Loading

realdadfish commented Aug 20, 2020

realdadfish commented Aug 20, 2020

BraisGabin commented Aug 20, 2020

arturbosch commented Aug 23, 2020 • edited Loading

realdadfish commented Aug 24, 2020

realdadfish commented Aug 24, 2020

BraisGabin commented Aug 25, 2020

realdadfish commented Aug 25, 2020

BraisGabin commented Aug 25, 2020

realdadfish commented Aug 25, 2020

BraisGabin commented Aug 25, 2020

arturbosch commented Aug 25, 2020

BraisGabin commented Aug 25, 2020

codecov bot commented Jun 11, 2020 •

edited

Loading

realdadfish commented Jun 15, 2020 •

edited

Loading

arturbosch commented Aug 4, 2020 •

edited

Loading

arturbosch commented Aug 9, 2020 •

edited

Loading

realdadfish commented Aug 9, 2020 •

edited

Loading

arturbosch commented Aug 23, 2020 •

edited

Loading