no more mobile version of the site

[GoogleCodeExporter]

this is mostly just a css problem, we have the old css in there and most of the 
places that check for 
mobileness still exist, we just didn't get it all running again. A few 
experiments in the 
middleware/domain.py should get it working again

Original issue reported on code.google.com by andyster on 14 Mar 2009 at 7:14

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Hi Andy,
Can you add some instruction/description? I'm not sure where to start...

Original comment by tony.t.t...@gmail.com on 27 Mar 2009 at 10:58

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Places to start:

We have in middleware/domain.py some stuff that looks for the 'm' subdomain and
attempts to set request.mobile = True if it finds it. Templates ought to be 
able to
look for request.mobile to see if they should be rendering themselves as a 
mobile
variant (likely including the mobile.css stuff).

Additionally, queries will likely have a slightly smaller page size if this is a
mobile site, so places like overview, explore and so on should probably check, 
also.

Original comment by andyster on 2 Apr 2009 at 8:48

• Added labels: Size-Medium

[GoogleCodeExporter]

I'm completely at a loss to where I would look to work out correcting stuff 
like this - 
if there's a css display issue I can usually work it out - eg. layouts getting 
skewed 
etc.

Original comment by alexleon...@gmail.com on 2 Apr 2009 at 9:03

[GoogleCodeExporter]

jonas appears to have started work on this and made significant headway

Original comment by andyster on 16 Apr 2009 at 9:20

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Initial patch has been put on rietku for review: http://rietku.appspot.com/10001

Original comment by jonasnoc...@gmail.com on 20 Apr 2009 at 7:37

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Great work Jonas! Keep it up. As mentioned I'm hoping to join in as soon as 
physically 
possible.

Original comment by alexleon...@gmail.com on 20 Apr 2009 at 11:26

[GoogleCodeExporter]

As a mobile version of the site is now in place (yay!), I think we should close 
this
issue. There are certainly issues left to deal with in this area but those 
should
probably be handled individually.

Original comment by jonasnoc...@gmail.com on 21 May 2009 at 10:17

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Original comment by adewale on 21 May 2009 at 10:43

• Changed state: Verified