Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fixed and tested vt. Removed UB in vt module. #1

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

pkesseli
Copy link
Contributor

Fixed and tested vt. Removed UB in vt module. Lots of format changes in java_bytecode_vtable.cpp to make it compliant with curent CBMC coding guideline.

@tautschnig
Copy link
Collaborator

Hi Pascal,
Great work, I'll leave it to @kroening to comment on most of the patch contents. For future patch sets, would it be possible to split out whitespace/formatting-only changes into a separate patch? This greatly simplifies reviewing and any potential future debugging.
Best,
Michael

@tautschnig
Copy link
Collaborator

This has been merged in 23aaf82, closing.

@tautschnig tautschnig closed this Mar 5, 2016
@pkesseli pkesseli deleted the vtable branch March 10, 2016 11:06
smowton referenced this pull request in smowton/cbmc Jan 3, 2017
Do not partially inline functions called from _start

This allows us to unambiguously identify the binding of the arguments 
to the parameters of entry point function.
mariusmc92 pushed a commit to mariusmc92/cbmc that referenced this pull request Mar 9, 2017
Updated LVSA data structures for Recency Analysis
polgreen referenced this pull request in polgreen/cbmc Nov 14, 2017
owen-mc-diffblue pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 20, 2019
We should keep the struct tag type, not follow it and get the struct type
tautschnig pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 21, 2019
We should keep the struct tag type, not follow it and get the struct type
zlfben pushed a commit to zlfben/cbmc that referenced this pull request May 13, 2021
I merged our code together and added a simple json parser (not completed but working).
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants