You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In the meantime, I found something that I think you know, but I would like to share.
For pixels that have few useful time samples, as you know, in Python they are treated with the condition:
From some results I obtained with Tile_1 data, I found some discrepancies in the results for magnitudes in Python vs OpenCL:
Where magnsPB is magnitudes in Python and magnsCLB is magnitudes in OpenCL, with a MSE (mean squared error) of 142647860.0.
This is the plot for the magnitudes <=0:
As we know, the algorithms are different so the results, but I managed to get some better results when I applied the same condition in OpenCL, after returning detailed results. Something like:
Namely, for this particular example, I like to use threshold 9 instead of 5. I obtained the results:
With a MSE of 0.30474687.
Do you think it is a good idea for the user to choose the value for the condition?
It's just an idea, not a big problem if we have good data to process.
Thank you!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hello Dmitry!
Thanks for the new commits! 👍
In the meantime, I found something that I think you know, but I would like to share.
For pixels that have few useful time samples, as you know, in Python they are treated with the condition:
From some results I obtained with Tile_1 data, I found some discrepancies in the results for magnitudes in Python vs OpenCL:
Where magnsPB is magnitudes in Python and magnsCLB is magnitudes in OpenCL, with a MSE (mean squared error) of 142647860.0.
This is the plot for the magnitudes <=0:
As we know, the algorithms are different so the results, but I managed to get some better results when I applied the same condition in OpenCL, after returning detailed results. Something like:
Namely, for this particular example, I like to use threshold 9 instead of 5. I obtained the results:
With a MSE of 0.30474687.
Do you think it is a good idea for the user to choose the value for the condition?
It's just an idea, not a big problem if we have good data to process.
Thank you!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: