Improve SBT caching during code generation

[majk-p]

Closes #1495.

@kubukoz's comment:

• adds a smithy4s/ prefix to generated paths under src_managed/main/scala to avoid clashing with other codegens (in the default config for the generated code output)
• changes the hashing of paths for the output directory to be string-based (os.Path), while inputs are still hashed based on contents (PathRef)

PR Checklist (not all items are relevant to all PRs)

• Added unit-tests (for runtime code)
• Added bootstrapped code + smoke tests (when the rendering logic is modified)
• Added build-plugins integration tests (when reflection loading is required at codegen-time)
• Added alloy compliance tests (when simpleRestJson protocol behaviour is expanded/updated)
• Updated dynamic module to match generated-code behaviour
• Added documentation
• Updated changelog

[CLAassistant]

All committers have signed the CLA.

[Baccata]

Don't forget to sign the CLA

[lefou]

Since it was requested in Mill's chat room, here is some input regarding Mill's cache. I have to admit, I didn't review the full PR and all comments, but from what I digested, here are my notes:

• If you return a PathRef that points to somewhere outside of Mill's cache, there is a chance Mill will miss it's later invalidation due to removal or change. Therefore in Mill 0.11 we introduced the revalidate flag which you can enable with PathRef.withRevalidateOnce. When enabled and before re-using a targets cache, Mill will re-calculate the PathRef.sig and will only use the cached value if the sig is still identical. I think you should use this flag since you don't have exclusive control over the output directory.

• Using an T.input or a PathRef in general for a path you intend to change from a downstream target, will most likely cause unnecessary re-evaluation. Since you intend to generate something into that path, it's sig will change. If you're not interested in the content of a path, which is the case for config values, the path itself should be enough.

[kubukoz]

LGTM (@Baccata, you haven't committed here so I'll leave it for you to approve if, it looks OK now)