Inaccurate description of the syntax of path types

[tejing1]

This:

nix-book/src/ch05-01-language-basics.md

Line 15 in f6448f4

They must start with a "." or "/", similar to how they would be expressed in a shell.

Isn't quite true. foo/bar is a valid path type, and . is not. The core thing that makes something a path type is the inclusion of a /, which is why starting with ./ is necessary for files in the current directory, and . has to be represented as ./..

[jonringer]

Ah, thanks.