You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
When a deprecation is triggered, it should be ensured that all important repositories don't use the deprecated feature anymore. In other words, it should be the job of the person introducing the deprecation to ensure that (1) the ecosystem is ready for it and (2) suitable replacements exists.
Some projects are less active than others, so we might only want to do this for projects to which we have merge access, i.e. projects at dlang-community
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
wilzbach
changed the title
Build all projects with -de
Build important projects with -de
Jan 26, 2018
No, I don't agree here, sure we should have an eye on the impact of a deprecation, but it's certainly not the job of language core team to fix the whole ecosystem before deprecating sth.
Ensuring that there are alternatives et.al. should be done in the review process.
When a deprecation is triggered, it should be ensured that all important repositories don't use the deprecated feature anymore. In other words, it should be the job of the person introducing the deprecation to ensure that (1) the ecosystem is ready for it and (2) suitable replacements exists.
Some projects are less active than others, so we might only want to do this for projects to which we have merge access, i.e. projects at
dlang-community
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: