-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 9
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Why your error rate is higher than original paper? #16
Comments
The exact algorithm for density map generation is not present in the original repos. I followed the procedure described in the MCNN paper (CVPR 2016). Values of some of the parameters are not given in the paper, so I have chosen them in such a way that my density maps look more or less similar to the xhp ones. |
The epoch is 1000. I think it is not a reason for higher error rate. But I do not know :) May be the main point is density map generation. |
Are you planning to reproduce the density map generation used in the official repo? |
Yes I am. I work on these topic. I think main point is density map generation. How did you find optimum parameters for this project? |
I checked your density map. And they are so different from original. Is this reason that error rate is higher the original paper?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: