Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[RFC] Implement distributed graph store to train giant graph on machines with limited memory #869

Closed
futurely opened this issue Sep 19, 2019 · 7 comments

Comments

@futurely
Copy link

futurely commented Sep 19, 2019

🚀 Feature

Implement distributed graph store to train giant graph on machines with limited memory.

Motivation

Many graphs need hundreds of GB or more memory to load into graph store. It's common that a single machine cannot load such graphs. So this problem is a serious blocker for large scale applications of DGL. Some other frameworks such as PyTorch-BigGraph and Euler partition the graph into smaller files for fully distributed training.

Pitch

Efficient distributed training with arbitrarily large graphs. Wider adoption of DGL especially in the industry.

@jermainewang
Copy link
Member

jermainewang commented Sep 19, 2019

Hey @futurely , thanks for your interests in the system optimization. If you have no objection I'd like to re-organize some of your feature requests into few RFCs so we could have more focused discussion.

@futurely
Copy link
Author

It's okay. Thanks!

@zheng-da
Copy link
Collaborator

Thanks for your request. In the next release, we will have distributed training capability. Please stay tuned.

@futurely futurely changed the title Implement distributed graph store to train giant graph on machines with limited memory [RFC] Implement distributed graph store to train giant graph on machines with limited memory Oct 14, 2019
@ChenAris
Copy link

We are also interested in distributed training across multiple machines and want to profile the communication cost. Is there a rough tentative date for the new release supporting this feature? Thanks.

@github-actions
Copy link

This issue has been automatically marked as stale due to lack of activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you

@github-actions
Copy link

This issue is closed due to lack of activity. Feel free to reopen it if you still have questions.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants