Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

JIT: remove srawix fallback #965

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Sep 4, 2014
Merged

Conversation

FioraAeterna
Copy link
Contributor

As far as I can tell, this has literally been here since the start of the git
history; maybe it was stubbed out because the author wasn't sure it was right?

It matches the PPC/Broadway manuals perfectly, though.

As far as I can tell, this has literally been here since the start of the git
history; maybe it was stubbed out because the author wasn't sure it was right?

It matches the PPC/Broadway manuals perfectly, though.
@Sonicadvance1
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM.
I was trying to determine why it was disabled when I was implementing this instruction in the ARMv7 JIT, but I couldn't see anything wrong with it before.

@lioncash
Copy link
Member

lioncash commented Sep 4, 2014

@FioraAeterna: This comment grants you the permission to merge this pull request whenever you think it is ready. After addressing the remaining comments, click this link to merge.


Yes~ finally someone confirmed my suspicions that the fallback wasn't needed. Thanks.

@dolphin-emu-bot allowmerge

@shuffle2
Copy link
Contributor

shuffle2 commented Sep 4, 2014

Yup, logic appears same as int.

shuffle2 added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 4, 2014
@shuffle2 shuffle2 merged commit 127fc1b into dolphin-emu:master Sep 4, 2014
@Icekhaos
Copy link

Icekhaos commented Sep 5, 2014

Since this apparently fits those manuals perfectly, I suggest you keep the code for reference.

@shuffle2
Copy link
Contributor

shuffle2 commented Sep 5, 2014

Please stop making unneeded comments on PRs (which have closed). Look at the diff. No "code for reference" was removed.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
5 participants