Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

output H264 video not well formated (RFC3984) #48

Closed
GoogleCodeExporter opened this issue Mar 13, 2015 · 4 comments
Closed

output H264 video not well formated (RFC3984) #48

GoogleCodeExporter opened this issue Mar 13, 2015 · 4 comments

Comments

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link

What steps will reproduce the problem?
1.Start IMSDroid and select video codec = H264-BP20
2.Start Linphone (http://www.linphone.org/) with H264 plugin
3.Make visio call beetween linphone client and IMSDroid

What is the expected output? What do you see instead?

The incoming video (from linphone client to IMSDroid) is correctly played on 
the android device (Desire) but there is no video on Linphone client despite of 
sends RTP/H264 from IMSDroid to Linphone client (wireshare traces in 
attachement).
The study of this trace show that:
1. The Sequence Parameter Set (SPS) is correctly set nal_type = 7
2. The Picture Parameter Set (PPS) is not well set. 
    The PPS is concatenated with the Supplemental enhancement information (SEI) and put in a FU_A which is not correct.
    The PPS must be put in a single packet with nal_type = 8
    The SEI must be put in single packet with nal_type = 6
3.The next frame is a non IDR picture (nal_type=1) which not correct an IDR 
must be send (nal_type=5)
4.After the nal_type seems to be not well set, because there is no nal_type = 5 
(IDR picture -> Key frame) in the trace


What version of the product are you using? On what operating system?
v1.0.271(doubango r479)

Please provide any additional information below.

Original issue reported on code.google.com by nicolas....@gmail.com on 31 Aug 2010 at 5:38

Attachments:

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

Original comment by boss...@yahoo.fr on 31 Aug 2010 at 8:34

  • Changed state: Accepted

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

Could you please try version 1.0.279?

Original comment by boss...@yahoo.fr on 7 Sep 2010 at 8:15

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

Fixed in revision 279.

Original comment by boss...@yahoo.fr on 12 Sep 2010 at 4:40

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

Original comment by boss...@yahoo.fr on 12 Sep 2010 at 4:40

  • Changed state: Fixed

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant