Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Align NetworkStream.Read Remarks with src inline documentation. #1930

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Apr 24, 2017

Conversation

ViktorHofer
Copy link
Member

@ViktorHofer ViktorHofer commented Apr 17, 2017

Summary

NetworkStream.Read remarks could be misleading and should align with inline corefx documentation.

Related

Fixes #1929

corefx inline documentation: https://github.com/dotnet/corefx/blob/master/src/System.Net.Sockets/src/System/Net/Sockets/NetworkStream.cs#L262

cc: @karelz

@dnfclas
Copy link

dnfclas commented Apr 17, 2017

@ViktorHofer,
Thanks for having already signed the Contribution License Agreement. Your agreement was validated by .NET Foundation. We will now review your pull request.
Thanks,
.NET Foundation Pull Request Bot

Copy link
Contributor

@mairaw mairaw left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. Thanks @ViktorHofer! Wondering if we wanna add that info to the returns tag similar to what we have in the source code, so it can show up in IntelliSense as well.

@ViktorHofer
Copy link
Member Author

@mairaw you are welcome. Yeah I thought the same. I will add it.

@ViktorHofer
Copy link
Member Author

@mairaw do you need anything else from me? Otherwise I will go into sleep mode here ;)

@mairaw
Copy link
Contributor

mairaw commented Apr 21, 2017

No, I don't. Thanks @ViktorHofer. I need to investigate why the build is still processing though.

@mairaw
Copy link
Contributor

mairaw commented Apr 24, 2017

Builds are finally green! 🎆

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants