Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Move to latest code style analyzer package #6685

Merged
merged 13 commits into from
Jun 20, 2023

Conversation

mavasani
Copy link
Member

Also fix the IDExxxx violations from the new package.

Recommended to review commit-by-commit

@mavasani mavasani requested a review from a team as a code owner June 14, 2023 12:09
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 14, 2023

Codecov Report

Merging #6685 (87bca54) into main (2f0301e) will decrease coverage by 0.01%.
The diff coverage is 50.00%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #6685      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   96.39%   96.38%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files        1379     1379              
  Lines      322416   322416              
  Branches    10461    10462       +1     
==========================================
- Hits       310784   310771      -13     
+ Misses       9139     9137       -2     
- Partials     2493     2508      +15     

Copy link
Member

@sharwell sharwell left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please disable IDE0290 and revert the associated changes. The rest looks fine.

@mavasani
Copy link
Member Author

Please disable IDE0290 and revert the associated changes. The rest looks fine.

Tagging @CyrusNajmabadi as well. I thought the idea is to dogfood the new analyzer/fixer for primary constructors. Are you suggesting the revert due to style preferences or the fact that there could still be bugs in the new feature/analyzer/fixer?

@CyrusNajmabadi
Copy link
Member

I would def appreciate dogfooding. But if you do run into issues, don't fix them, just revert that case and let me know. :-)

@sharwell
Copy link
Member

sharwell commented Jun 15, 2023

Are you suggesting the revert due to style preferences or the fact that there could still be bugs in the new feature/analyzer/fixer?

Strictly due to style preference. The analyzer/fixer may work fine, but I have no interest in using it.

@mavasani
Copy link
Member Author

@sharwell Reverted the primary constructor style changes. Please take a look.

@mavasani mavasani merged commit 402fdfe into dotnet:main Jun 20, 2023
11 checks passed
@mavasani mavasani deleted the MoveToLatestCodeStyle branch June 20, 2023 15:17
@github-actions github-actions bot added this to the vNext milestone Jun 20, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants