Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

drsolver - Error code 202 #5

Closed
imba-pericia opened this issue Feb 1, 2024 · 3 comments
Closed

drsolver - Error code 202 #5

imba-pericia opened this issue Feb 1, 2024 · 3 comments

Comments

@imba-pericia
Copy link

Wanted to check it on tesla p40.
Solver writes the following lines to the log:

[2024-02-01 13:51:22.213] [info] Connecting to server https://solvers>
[2024-02-01 13:51:22.518] [info] Connected to server! (305.24331 ms)
[2024-02-01 13:51:22.520] [info] Solving registration challenge...
[2024-02-01 13:51:22.520] [error] DrError code: 202

When start drsolver - WARN - implement in-place sort

It's because of p40?

@drnick23
Copy link
Collaborator

drnick23 commented Feb 1, 2024

Yes, it's because it's running a pre-ampere architecture.

It's possible to support lower architectures but there will be additional performance loss, and the compute / W won't be competitive.

@imba-pericia
Copy link
Author

Yes, it's because it's running a pre-ampere architecture.

Thanks for the quick response.

It's possible to support lower architectures but there will be additional performance loss, and the compute / W won't be competitive.

Perhaps farmers with 100tb may be satisfied with this.

@drnick23
Copy link
Collaborator

I don't think the economics of pre-ampere graphics cards will make sense, they are just not as energy efficient and won't be profitable to run.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants