Don't specify scope in dependencyManagement of BOM #3373
Merged
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
<dependencyManagement>
is commonly used for locking down the version of a dependency, not its scope. Doing that breaks the scope of transitive dependencies and is very hard to troubleshoot.Problem:
I've a dependency in my project:
keycloak-core
'spom.xml
has the followingcompile
dependency:With
dropwizard-dependencies
BOM in my project, here is howkeycloak-core
looks like in the output of maven dependency tree:(edited for brevity)
The problem is in the last line, the bouncy castle dependency got its scope changed to
test
, becausedropwizard-dependency
's<dependencyManagement>
section specifies a<scope>
for the bouncy castle artifact which takes precedence and converts all transitive dependencies on that artifact to thetest
scope. I believe the intention here was to lock down transitive dependencies versions not scopes. The scope is always specified alongside the<dependency>
declaration in the actual<dependencies>
anyway.Solution:
Remove
<scope>
declaration from<dependencyManagement>
.Result:
Avoid surprises during builds. The BOM is intended to lock versions not scopes.