Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[New Resource] xPfxExport #26

Closed
PlagueHO opened this issue Jul 25, 2016 · 3 comments
Closed

[New Resource] xPfxExport #26

PlagueHO opened this issue Jul 25, 2016 · 3 comments
Labels
in progress The issue is being actively worked on by someone. resource proposal The issue is proposing a new resource in the resource module.

Comments

@PlagueHO
Copy link
Member

User Story: Need to be able to use certificates that are either already in the Windows Certificate Mahine Store (or have been requested via xCertReq) in software that does not use the Windows Certificate Store to store certificates. An example is Java Key Store (JKS) files.

This would require a certificate to be found in the machine store (via Thumbprint, Subject, Serial Number, KU, Issuer etc) and then exported to a file (if the file does not exist), encrypting with a password or user/group combination (for Windows Server 2012+).

Export of the Private key would only be able to occur if it was available and exportable for the certificate identified for export.

If no one else is working on this I'll look at getting this one implemented (if there are no objections).

@johlju
Copy link
Member

johlju commented Jul 26, 2016

No PR's currently for review and no other open issues regarding this. So I say, go for it. Sounds like a great addition.
Great idea @PlagueHO

@PlagueHO
Copy link
Member Author

Thanks @johlju - I'll get this done.

@kwirkykat kwirkykat added in progress The issue is being actively worked on by someone. resource proposal The issue is proposing a new resource in the resource module. labels Aug 18, 2016
@PlagueHO PlagueHO changed the title [New Resource] PfxExport [New Resource] xPfxExport Jan 7, 2017
@PlagueHO
Copy link
Member Author

I'm going to close this issue because it will get rolled into #41.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
in progress The issue is being actively worked on by someone. resource proposal The issue is proposing a new resource in the resource module.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants