You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The current implementation of mpnum.special.sumup is probably not the best. [1, Eq. (153)] suggests a more efficient algorithm for compression after summation. We should try it out.
[1] U. Schollwöck, “The density-matrix renormalization group in the age of matrix product states,” Annals of Physics, vol. 326, no. 1, pp. 96–192, Jan. 2011.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
dsuess
changed the title
Fix mpnum.special.sumup
Fix mpnum.special.sumup
Dec 1, 2016
It's not exactly the sweeping-based solution proposed in [1], but it accomplishes a good scaling by using sparse matrices and (possibly) randomized truncated SVDs.
The current implementation of
mpnum.special.sumup
is probably not the best. [1, Eq. (153)] suggests a more efficient algorithm for compression after summation. We should try it out.[1] U. Schollwöck, “The density-matrix renormalization group in the age of matrix product states,” Annals of Physics, vol. 326, no. 1, pp. 96–192, Jan. 2011.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: