-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 26
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
DOC: Update readme to reflect current output of duecredit summary #89
Conversation
|
||
1 package cited | ||
0 modules cited | ||
1 function cited |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I wondered now if we should add 1 more:
x citable modules were imported but no citable functionality was used ;-)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
mmmh, I'm not really enthusiastic about it ;p isn't the whole idea of tags to reduce the noise? we could have another command like duecredit stats
that provides some stats?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Well we are providing stats already... I just thought it might come handy to inform user that some modules were possibly used but not listed
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
But ok, we can leave it for later
Current coverage is 84.09%@@ master #89 diff @@
==========================================
Files 46 46
Lines 2253 2187 -66
Methods 0 0
Messages 0 0
Branches 249 251 +2
==========================================
- Hits 1905 1839 -66
Misses 266 266
Partials 82 82
|
This one is not affected by the fix in #88 right? |
yes it is. good point. |
ok -- review/merge #90, adjust this one, we will merge and release! |
[Full Changelog](0.5.0...0.6.0) **Implemented enhancements:** - Support system-specific references [\#81](#81) - export to bibtex doesn't support tags yet [\#19](#19) - ENH: support DUECREDIT\_REPORT\_ALL=1 to report all citations, not only with functionality used [\#92](#92) ([yarikoptic](https://github.com/yarikoptic)) **Fixed bugs:** - Outputting to bibtex doesn't filter by used citations [\#68](#68) - references package even if no cited functions/methods used [\#48](#48) - When injecting multiple citations at the same point, only one referenced [\#47](#47) **Merged pull requests:** - BF: allow multiple injections at the same path, avoid resetting \_orig\_import if already deactivated [\#91](#91) ([yarikoptic](https://github.com/yarikoptic)) - DOC: Update readme to reflect current output of duecredit summary [\#89](#89) ([mvdoc](https://github.com/mvdoc)) - enable codecov coverage reports [\#87](#87) ([yarikoptic](https://github.com/yarikoptic)) - REF,ENH: refactor {BibTeX,Text}Output into Output class with subclasses [\#86](#86) ([mvdoc](https://github.com/mvdoc)) * tag '0.6.0': (39 commits) CHANGELOG DOC: clarify DUECREDIT_REPORT_ALL usage ENH: use any instead of list when filtering packages DOC: Update readme to show how to use the new flag TST: test also DUECREDIT_REPORT_TAGS while we're at it TST: test all the flags TST: test that DUECREDIT_REPORT_ALL works ENH: support DUECREDIT_REPORT_ALL=1 DOC: Update readme DOC: fix small change to readme DOC: update readme to reflect current output ENH: do not demand coverage for the code we hope should never be triggered BF: exec to figure out version should be done with locals(), globals() ???: naively hoping that previous bug triggered on travis would be gone fixed by prev fix ENH+RF: track per injector either it is active and do not deactivate in __del__ if not TST: add test for double injection BF+ENH(LOG): decorate prev decorated object during injection + improve logging enable codecov coverage reports Fix Py3 annoyances BF: BibTeXOutput returns only unique bibtexs ...
So pretty! ;-)