Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

How to Deal with Multiple Comments #92

Open
ghost opened this issue Jun 19, 2017 · 2 comments
Open

How to Deal with Multiple Comments #92

ghost opened this issue Jun 19, 2017 · 2 comments

Comments

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Jun 19, 2017

Linked to:

#59

We could also update/edit the dwylbot comment to add or remove description errors, so only having one comment instead of multiple (one per error).

#61

if there are two separate rules independent of each other then dwylbot may post twice (unnecessarily) for both issues. If there is a dependency, dwylbot will only post at each step in the process that isn't followed

We need to think about how we deal with multiple comments - for now let's not focus on this, but we should adapt this with feedback from testers who experience multiple comments. Our assumption is currently that this isn't a good thing and ideally comments should be combined

@ghost
Copy link
Author

ghost commented Jun 23, 2017

One to note: dwyl/dwyl-site#290

@dwylbot
Copy link

dwylbot bot commented Sep 12, 2017

@SimonLab the in-progress label has been added to this issue without a time estimation.
Please add a time estimation to this issue before applying the in-progress label.

Any questions, complaints, feedback, contributions?
Discuss
If you prefer, you can also send us anonymous feedback: https://dwyl-feedback.herokuapp.com/feedback/new

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant