Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

E2B local use #239

Open
Deph1 opened this issue Nov 25, 2023 · 9 comments
Open

E2B local use #239

Deph1 opened this issue Nov 25, 2023 · 9 comments
Labels
feature New feature or request question Question

Comments

@Deph1
Copy link

Deph1 commented Nov 25, 2023

Hi there,

is it possible for this to be ran locally? I'm aware of the horrors/dangers of it but that's entirely why I want to!

thanks

@mlejva
Copy link
Member

mlejva commented Nov 27, 2023

Hey @Deph1,

We'll be open sourcing the whole infrastructure powering E2B soon which will make it possible to self-host it.

But running it locally on your machine might be a bit tricky if you're using macOS or Windows though. E2B is powered by Firecracker microVM. Firecrackers require KVM which isn't on macOS nor WIndows.

This means that you'd most likely run our E2B's infrastructure on Linux

@microchipgnu
Copy link

Good to hear that you're planning on letting folks self-host your infrastructure.

Will you consider a workaround with some virtualization to let us dev locally? I imagine there could exist a way to do with with VMWare ou Hyper-V

Would love to hear your thoughts

@chymian
Copy link

chymian commented Dec 12, 2023

@mlejva ,
these are good news. can we track the progress here?

even so I just found out about E2B, it looks like what I've been searching for a while.
So, when you need somebody to test, let me know.

@mlejva
Copy link
Member

mlejva commented Dec 13, 2023

@microchipgnu

Will you consider a workaround with some virtualization to let us dev locally? I imagine there could exist a way to do with with VMWare ou Hyper-V

It's not currently on our roadmap but definitely doable (using VMWare for example). Our main focus will be to offer great DX for self-hosting on AWS, GCP, and Azure first.

@chymian

these are good news. can we track the progress here?
We'll do a public announcement once we open source the infrastructure part. Should be soon. We're just backlogged with a few scaling issues and bugs with an unexpected traffic surge.

You mentioned that you've been searching for something like E2B for a while, would love to know what kind of use cases do you have in mind?

@chymian
Copy link

chymian commented Dec 14, 2023

I want to establish a flexible Framework for exploring, developing & running AGIs, as well as LLMs/APIs.
All locally hosted.
Next to my interest to explore AGIs, it's to create a Low-/No-Code environment for self hosted AI-SaaS for SMEs.
That woud be a programmatically deployable local infrastructure for both, AI-Backends and Apps.

@chymian
Copy link

chymian commented Jan 2, 2024

@mlejva any roadmap/timeframe when you plan to opensource your framework?
and a very happy 2024!

@mlejva
Copy link
Member

mlejva commented Jan 2, 2024

@mlejva any roadmap/timeframe when you plan to opensource your framework? and a very happy 2024!

aiming for January

@ValentaTomas ValentaTomas added the Improvement Improvement for current functionality label Mar 26, 2024
@ValentaTomas ValentaTomas added question Question feature New feature or request and removed Improvement Improvement for current functionality labels Jul 22, 2024
@ValentaTomas ValentaTomas changed the title local use E2B local use Jul 22, 2024
@QuietRocket
Copy link

Hi. I am interested in running the E2B's Firecracker based backend on GCP. Seems like it's re-emerging in demand. Any updates on development? I am open to testing if it's not polished yet. Thanks!

@mlejva
Copy link
Member

mlejva commented Jul 25, 2024

Hey @QuietRocket it's not ready yet, sorry. We're tackling some scaling issues right now. We'd like to get first self-hosting version out soon though.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
feature New feature or request question Question
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants