Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

CRAN failures #258

Closed
IndrajeetPatil opened this issue Jun 5, 2024 · 5 comments
Closed

CRAN failures #258

IndrajeetPatil opened this issue Jun 5, 2024 · 5 comments

Comments

@IndrajeetPatil
Copy link
Member

https://cloud.r-project.org/web/checks/check_results_modelbased.html

@strengejacke
Copy link
Member

See #257 :-)

@DominiqueMakowski
Copy link
Member

Ripley:

Please see the problems shown on
https://cran.r-project.org/web/checks/check_results_modelbased.html.

We have had to exclude this from the Fedora checks as it had to be
killed (twice) when using over 50GB of VM and causing the machine to
swap. This only happened on the update to some other package (insight?)

The CRAN policy calls that 'anti-social'.


And from the M1mac additional issue

  • Don't show:

  • }) # examplesIf
    Loading required package: mgcv
    Loading required package: nlme
    This is mgcv 1.9-1. For overview type 'help("mgcv-package")'.

model <- mgcv::gam(Sepal.Width ~ s(Petal.Length), data = iris)
slopes <- estimate_slopes(model, at = "Petal.Length", length = 50)
No numeric variable was specified for slope estimation. Selecting trend = "Peta l.Length".
Warning: Argument at is deprecated and will be removed in a future
release.
Please use by instead.
summary(slopes)
Warning: Function data_find() is deprecated and will be removed in a
future
release. Please use extract_column_names() instead.
Error: vector memory limit of 16.0 Gb reached, see mem.maxVSize()
Execution halted

as well as incorrect results.

@IndrajeetPatil
Copy link
Member Author

it had to be killed (twice) when using over 50GB of VM and causing the machine to swap

Wow. What test or example is making such a huge memory impact? Can we reproduce this on GHA?

@strengejacke
Copy link
Member

I can't think of any changes in insight that could have such an impact?

@IndrajeetPatil
Copy link
Member Author

My guess is that this might be coming from some modeling package we are using in example. Either that or we have some recursive function misbehaving.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants