Setup for Java12andUp tests (jep334)

[theresa-m]

see #4195 for dependencies

• including playlist.xml entry for jep334 tests

Signed-off-by: Theresa Mammarella Theresa.T.Mammarella@ibm.com

[theresa-m]

update copyright, merge conflict

[DanHeidinga]

@llxia Can you or a delegate review this?

[theresa-m]

updated to resolve conflicting files

[smlambert]

If its expected the Jep334Tests target work for jdk13, and on, then a minor change to subset to use 12+, otherwise LGTM

[smlambert]

I am guessing these tests would be for 12+ subsets/versions.

As discussed in separate review, this can stay implementation-agnostic, until someone adds a variant/mode that contains a command line option that hotspot doesn't recognize. With NoOptions, its good as is.

[theresa-m]

yes it should be 12+. I will fix that

[theresa-m]

updated with that change

[smlambert]

Launched Grinder: https://ci.eclipse.org/openj9/view/Test/job/Test-Grinder/272
to verify that testng doesn't complain if no test classes specified.

@theresa-m - have you tried running this test target locally ?

[theresa-m]

ooh just tried the test frame work does not like that its empty. I can lump this commit in with one of my prs that actually adds a test so there's no error. I made this separate because I wasn't sure which one would get merged first. sorry I didn't think that would be an issue

[theresa-m]

Adding this commit to #4105 instead to avoid the compilation problem.

[smlambert]

no worries, we could have additionally added a dummy class in this PR, but looks like you have a good approach to shift it anyway :) Thanks for strengthening the jdk12 testing story, very much appreciated!!