-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 407
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Which candidate to test transport layer ? #1338
Labels
discussion
Discussion about anything
Comments
Another solution is to directly target another protocol like experiment about mqtt ? #1236 |
If we decide to test a new Java CoAP implementation, for now the better choice would be java-coap (fork). |
Discussion about current experimentation with java-coap(fork) at #1373 |
We provide now a CoAP implementation based on java-coap(fork), See #1373 for more details. I think we can close this issue. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
To test abstraction Layer, it could make sense to try to implement a new transport based on something else than Californium.
One possible way is to create a new CoAP endpoint Provider based another CoAP java library.
I tried to look what is currently available 👇
I also find there was a project to provide a CoAP implementation in OpenJDK known as Kona but it seems the project is archived.
Too bad, It could have been a simple default implementation without any dependencies and californium would have been the full feature one.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: