Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Fix ignored stores serializing forked initial value #903

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Jul 19, 2023
Merged

Fix ignored stores serializing forked initial value #903

merged 1 commit into from Jul 19, 2023

Conversation

kireevmp
Copy link
Contributor

Resolves #609

@stackblitz
Copy link

stackblitz bot commented May 17, 2023

Review PR in StackBlitz Codeflow Run & review this pull request in StackBlitz Codeflow.

@netlify
Copy link

netlify bot commented May 17, 2023 •
edited

‼️ Deploy request for effector-docs rejected.

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 466335c

@zerobias zerobias self-requested a review June 6, 2023 10:51
zerobias
zerobias approved these changes Jun 6, 2023
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@zerobias zerobias left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Great, thanks 🙏 Will be released in effector 23

@zerobias zerobias added this to the effector Spacewatch 23.0.0 milestone Jun 6, 2023
@zerobias zerobias mentioned this pull request Jun 6, 2023
Closed
75 tasks
@sergeysova sergeysova changed the base branch from master to release/v23 July 6, 2023 06:34
@zerobias zerobias merged commit 476e907 into effector:release/v23 Jul 19, 2023
1 check passed
@kireevmp kireevmp mentioned this pull request Feb 10, 2024
Closed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@zerobias zerobias zerobias approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
effector Spacewatch 23.0.0
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Replacement of values during fork brakes serialization ignore
2 participants
@kireevmp @zerobias