Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

trellix_epo_cloud: work around static CEL now global behaviour #7004

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 19, 2023

Conversation

efd6
Copy link
Contributor

@efd6 efd6 commented Jul 19, 2023

What does this PR do?

The now global is currently static for the life of the filebeat CEL input meaning that it may be potentially many hours in the past. Fix this by using the dynamic now() function which is evaluated at the time of the sub-expression's evaluation.

See elastic/beats#36107 for details.

In this case the work-around is not really any different to using the now global once elastic/beats#36107 is merged and released, but this should be reverted as after that as in the general case, the now() function should be avoided unless needed.

Checklist

  • I have reviewed tips for building integrations and this pull request is aligned with them.
  • I have verified that all data streams collect metrics or logs.
  • I have added an entry to my package's changelog.yml file.
  • I have verified that Kibana version constraints are current according to guidelines.

Author's Checklist

  • [ ]

How to test this PR locally

Related issues

Screenshots

@efd6 efd6 added bug Something isn't working, use only for issues Team:Security-External Integrations labels Jul 19, 2023
@efd6 efd6 self-assigned this Jul 19, 2023
@elasticmachine
Copy link

elasticmachine commented Jul 19, 2023

💚 Build Succeeded

the below badges are clickable and redirect to their specific view in the CI or DOCS
Pipeline View Test View Changes Artifacts preview preview

Expand to view the summary

Build stats

  • Start Time: 2023-07-19T03:59:01.338+0000

  • Duration: 17 min 9 sec

Test stats 🧪

Test Results
Failed 0
Passed 24
Skipped 0
Total 24

🤖 GitHub comments

Expand to view the GitHub comments

To re-run your PR in the CI, just comment with:

  • /test : Re-trigger the build.

@elasticmachine
Copy link

elasticmachine commented Jul 19, 2023

🌐 Coverage report

Name Metrics % (covered/total) Diff
Packages 100.0% (3/3) 💚
Files 100.0% (3/3) 💚
Classes 100.0% (3/3) 💚
Methods 100.0% (41/41) 💚 7.64
Lines 88.652% (1125/1269) 👎 -3.096
Conditionals 100.0% (0/0) 💚

The now global is currently static for the life of the filebeat CEL input
meaning that it may be potentially many hours in the past. Fix this by
using the dynamic now() function which is evaluated at the time of the
sub-expression's evaluation.
@efd6 efd6 marked this pull request as ready for review July 19, 2023 04:19
@efd6 efd6 requested a review from a team as a code owner July 19, 2023 04:19
@elasticmachine
Copy link

Pinging @elastic/security-external-integrations (Team:Security-External Integrations)

Copy link
Contributor

@kcreddy kcreddy left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@efd6 efd6 merged commit d203964 into elastic:main Jul 19, 2023
1 check passed
@elasticmachine
Copy link

Package trellix_epo_cloud - 1.0.1 containing this change is available at https://epr.elastic.co/search?package=trellix_epo_cloud

gizas pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 5, 2023
The now global is currently static for the life of the filebeat CEL input
meaning that it may be potentially many hours in the past. Fix this by
using the dynamic now() function which is evaluated at the time of the
sub-expression's evaluation.
@andrewkroh andrewkroh added the Integration:trellix_epo_cloud Trellix ePO Cloud label Jul 22, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working, use only for issues Integration:trellix_epo_cloud Trellix ePO Cloud
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants