You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Wouldn't it be better for a statically typed language such as Elm to encode attribute values with appropriate types rather than using strings for most things?
I'm thinking especially of paths being defined as strings.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Note: This library aims to be the most basic API. In some cases it is possible to use union types to build nicer abstractions, but this starts bringing personal taste into things and has some additional maintainance cost if the underlying spec changes. I think it is best to build such abstractions on top of this library as a separate package.
Wouldn't it be better for a statically typed language such as Elm to encode attribute values with appropriate types rather than using strings for most things?
I'm thinking especially of paths being defined as strings.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: