Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Example manifests need to protect kip's internal storage/state #52

Closed
2 tasks done
justnoise opened this issue Mar 26, 2020 · 0 comments · Fixed by #111
Closed
2 tasks done

Example manifests need to protect kip's internal storage/state #52

justnoise opened this issue Mar 26, 2020 · 0 comments · Fixed by #111
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request good first issue Good for newcomers

Comments

@justnoise
Copy link
Contributor

justnoise commented Mar 26, 2020

Kip keeps an internal storage of:

  • Identity
  • CA
  • Pods and Nodes

If a kip deployment is restarted without preserving the PersistentVolume kip's state is stored on, all pods will be restarted and the previous kip cells will be orphaned in the cloud since kip's identity will be recreated as well. We've talked about this in other discussions in slack.

Todo:

  • Ensure our deployment scripts recreate the persistent volume that stores kip's data
  • Explore using a statefulSet as a method of ensuring virtual-kubelet identity. That would require creating a cluster identity in the API server when starting up kip and then using that plus the stateful identity to identify cloud resources that belong to an instance of a kip instance.
@ldx ldx added enhancement New feature or request good first issue Good for newcomers labels Apr 28, 2020
@jrroman jrroman self-assigned this May 19, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request good first issue Good for newcomers
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants