Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Move @babel/core to peerDependencies to resolve peer dependency warnings and errors #452

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 1, 2022

Conversation

NullVoxPopuli
Copy link
Sponsor Contributor

…confusion

Following the advice here: ember-cli/ember-cli#9934 (comment)

The eventual perceived fix for users is that when using strict package managers (npm 8, yarn2+, pnpm, etc) is that when they are told to specify a missing peer, @babel/core, the @babel/core they specify will be the one used by ember-cli-babel.

@babel/core will eventually be added to the app and addon blueprints in ember-cli/ember-cli#9934

@NullVoxPopuli
Copy link
Sponsor Contributor Author

I have 8 failures when I run the tests -- but those 8 failures also exist on master so.... that's fun

@ef4
Copy link
Collaborator

ef4 commented Aug 10, 2022

You need a devDependency too.

(This is an example of the confusing fallout from making v1 addons be their own test-app too, in a single package. The package.json has two meanings. It needs to do the work that a consuming app would do (put @babel/core in devDependencies) while also doing the work of the addon (put @babel/core in peerDependencies).

@NullVoxPopuli
Copy link
Sponsor Contributor Author

devDependency is there

@ef4
Copy link
Collaborator

ef4 commented Aug 10, 2022

Oops, sorry, somehow I looked right at it and didn't see it. 😛

@ef4
Copy link
Collaborator

ef4 commented Sep 8, 2022

I think we can make the argument that this is a bugfix instead of breaking change because people were already experiencing peer dep warnings and/or failures depending on their package manager, so documenting the fact that you already needed this peer dep to avoid those issues is only a bug fix.

@bertdeblock
Copy link
Member

This seems ready to go?

@ef4
Copy link
Collaborator

ef4 commented Sep 15, 2022

It was pointed out to me that this really is probably breaking, because it's not the addition to peerDependencies that is the big problem, it's the removal from dependencies.

@ef4
Copy link
Collaborator

ef4 commented Sep 15, 2022

I still think we should do it, we can make this ember-cli-babel 8.

I know a traditional reason not to do a major release here was to save it for a babel major release, but this change means we're decoupled from the babel version anyway.

@NullVoxPopuli
Copy link
Sponsor Contributor Author

Sounds good to me -- as long as we can specify in the release notes that resolutions / overrides can still be used to collapse all ember-cli-babel versions down to 1 version in folks dep-trees, and v8 would still be compatible with their projects, provided they add @babel/core (and likely meet other criteria we move as a part of the major (node engines, etc))

@ef4
Copy link
Collaborator

ef4 commented Sep 28, 2022

Discussed with ember-cli core team and agreed to merge this, once we see it run CI. For some reason that hasn't happened yet. Investigating.

Also, the plan to release this is tracked in #453 which I will fill out with more details.

@ef4 ef4 mentioned this pull request Sep 28, 2022
10 tasks
@bertdeblock
Copy link
Member

bertdeblock commented Oct 1, 2022

@NullVoxPopuli I added a test commit and dropped it again to trigger CI, hope you don't mind!

@bertdeblock bertdeblock added the bug label Oct 1, 2022
@bertdeblock bertdeblock changed the title Move @babel/core to peerDependencies to reduce dependency resolution … Move @babel/core to peerDependencies to resolve peer dependency warnings and errors Oct 1, 2022
@bertdeblock
Copy link
Member

CI is green, so I'm merging!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants