Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Include byteorder inline or re-export only? #2

Closed
Enet4 opened this issue Jul 22, 2018 · 1 comment
Closed

Include byteorder inline or re-export only? #2

Enet4 opened this issue Jul 22, 2018 · 1 comment

Comments

@Enet4
Copy link
Owner

Enet4 commented Jul 22, 2018

Since this crate is envisioned as an extension to byteorder, should this crate just re-export all members of its public API, or keep it as a public module, as it currently is?
@Enet4
Copy link
Owner Author

Enet4 commented Dec 3, 2018

It is now currently envisioned as an alternative API, so keeping it as a re-exported crate is fine for the time being.

@Enet4 Enet4 closed this as completed Dec 3, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@Enet4