Client without graphql
dependency
#139
Replies: 1 comment 1 reply
-
Hey hey, there is no need to remove the server part of the lib because it does not get bundled when targeting browsers. You'll only have what Having said this, splitting up the lib into 2 parts is completely unnecessary and is actually an overkill for a small lib like this one. Furthermore, All use-cases that dont require GraphQL fall out of this lib's scope. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Hey there!
I'm working on a client-side project that is trying to avoid any dependencies on the
graphql
package. I'm currently usinggraphql-ws
but need to maintain a separate fork at the moment that removes the server implementation (and the dependency ongraphql
).Would you be interested in splitting
graphql-ws
into two separate packages? Something likegraphql-ws-client
andgraphql-ws-server
? They can both be exported fromgraphql-ws
so that people can still depend on the combination but doing so would allow projects to avoid unnecessary dependencies.If this is something you are open to, I can submit a PR to get the process started :)
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions