We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
I think that epidist_formula should pass tests of this form. It currently doesn't.
epidist_formula
test_that("epidist_formula.epidist_latent_individual with custom formulas errors for incorrect custom formulas", { # nolint: line_length_linter. expect_error(epidist_formula(prep_obs, delay_central = ~ 1 + age)) expect_error(epidist_formula(prep_obs, sigma = ~ 1 + age)) expect_error(epidist_formula(prep_obs, delay_central = 1)) expect_error(epidist_formula(prep_obs, sigma = 1)) })
I propose to add the following to epidist_formula:
I am interested in steers on the best way to do 1. and 2.
For 2. I am interested what range of formulas we should accept. For example should we accept strings?
checkmate
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
latent_individual
athowes
Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.
I think that
epidist_formula
should pass tests of this form. It currently doesn't.I propose to add the following to
epidist_formula
:I am interested in steers on the best way to do 1. and 2.
For 2. I am interested what range of formulas we should accept. For example should we accept strings?
Resources
checkmate
for argument checking #45The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: