Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

If non-white noise is added to an output it appears that the time constants are over-estimated(minor bug) #82

Open
steinelg opened this issue Nov 12, 2021 · 0 comments
Labels
bug Something isn't working

Comments

@steinelg
Copy link
Collaborator

It is possible that this is a good case for re-introducing some filtering of the output y before identification?

At least, by subtracting the modelled Y from the real Y, it should be possible to determine if the noise appears white or not, after identification, and that could be used to apply a method that is more suitable to this sort of process.

LIkely, the time-constant "smoothes" out the model and this is somehow advantageous for the objective function in this case - but it is not based on reality.

Maybe if the process is "non-white noise" it is more appropriate to disable time-constants altogether?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant