ecommerce description & info add on api #4966
Conversation
![sourcery-ai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/48477?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
PR Type: Enhancement
PR Summary: The pull request introduces enhancements to the ecommerce plugin API by adding 'description' and 'info' fields to the product review functionality. This includes updates to the GraphQL schema, resolver mutations, and the model definitions to accommodate the new fields. The changes aim to enrich the product review capabilities, allowing for more detailed reviews and additional information to be stored and processed.
Decision: Comment
📝 Type: 'Enhancement' - not supported yet.
- Sourcery currently only approves 'Typo fix' PRs.
✅ Issue addressed: this change correctly addresses the issue or implements the desired feature.
No details provided.
✅ Small diff: the diff is small enough to approve with confidence.
No details provided.
General suggestions:
- Consider implementing validation for the new 'description' and 'info' fields to ensure data integrity and security. This could include type checks, length constraints, and schema validation for the JSON content of the 'info' field.
- Review the use of the 'any' type for the 'info' field in the model definitions. A more specific type or interface could provide better type safety and clarity about the expected structure of the data.
- Ensure that the enhancements introduced by this PR are well-documented, including any new requirements or constraints on the data for the 'description' and 'info' fields. This will help developers and users of the API understand how to effectively use the new features.
Thanks for using Sourcery. We offer it for free for open source projects and would be very grateful if you could help us grow. If you like it, would you consider sharing Sourcery on your favourite social media? ✨
| ) => { | ||
| const { productId, customerId, review } = params; | ||
| const { productId, customerId, review, description, info } = params; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
suggestion (llm): Ensure that the newly added description and info fields are properly validated for type and content before being processed. This is crucial for maintaining data integrity and preventing potential injection attacks.
| @@ -4,6 +4,8 @@ export const types = ` | |||
| productId: String! | |||
| customerId : String | |||
| review: Float | |||
| description: String | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
question (llm): Given that description is a new field, consider if there should be any constraints on its content, such as length or format, to ensure consistency and data quality.
| @@ -4,6 +4,8 @@ | |||
| productId: String! | |||
| customerId : String | |||
| review: Float | |||
| description: String | |||
| info: JSON | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
suggestion (llm): Storing info as JSON provides flexibility but also poses a risk for unstructured or unexpected data. It's advisable to have a schema validation in place for the JSON content to prevent potential issues.
| @@ -5,6 +5,8 @@ export interface IProductreview { | |||
| productId: string; | |||
| customerId: string; | |||
| review: number; | |||
| description: string; | |||
| info: any; | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
suggestion (llm): Using any type for the info field lacks type safety. If possible, define a more specific type or interface that reflects the expected structure of info to enhance code reliability and maintainability.
|
Ecommerce plugin api improve