Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

sendReply #5017

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Feb 23, 2024
Merged

sendReply #5017

merged 3 commits into from
Feb 23, 2024

Conversation

uuganaa1007
Copy link
Collaborator

ISSUE

Context

Your context here. Additionally, any screenshots. Delete this line.

// Delete the below section once completed

PR Checklist

  • Description is clearly stated under Context section
  • Screenshots and the additional verifications are attached

Copy link

@sourcery-ai sourcery-ai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

PR Type: Refactoring

PR Summary: This pull request appears to focus on refactoring the handling of Facebook messages within the plugin-facebook-api package. It includes changes to streamline the parsing of message payloads and the handling of conversations and posts. Notably, it removes a block of code responsible for sending inbox messages, which suggests a shift in how notifications are managed or an optimization of the notification process.

Decision: Comment

📝 Type: 'Refactoring' - not supported yet.
  • Sourcery currently only approves 'Typo fix' PRs.
📝 Issue not addressed: this change does not correctly address the issue or implement the desired feature.
No details provided.
✅ Small diff: the diff is small enough to approve with confidence.
No details provided.

General suggestions:

  • Ensure that the removal of the sendInboxMessage function call does not unintentionally impact the notification system. If this functionality has been moved elsewhere, it may be helpful to mention this in the PR description for clarity.
  • The PR description could be improved by providing more context about the changes made and their impact on the system. Including the specific issue being addressed (with a valid link) and any relevant screenshots or additional verifications would make the PR more comprehensive.
  • Given the nature of the changes, it would be beneficial to ensure that all affected functionalities are thoroughly tested, especially those related to message handling and notifications.

Thanks for using Sourcery. We offer it for free for open source projects and would be very grateful if you could help us grow. If you like it, would you consider sharing Sourcery on your favourite social media? ✨

Share Sourcery

Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment to tell me if it was helpful.

Copy link

sonarcloud bot commented Feb 23, 2024

Quality Gate Passed Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
No data about Coverage
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud

@enkhtuvshinD enkhtuvshinD merged commit 5df6447 into dev Feb 23, 2024
3 of 4 checks passed
@enkhtuvshinD enkhtuvshinD deleted the post-receive-fix4 branch February 23, 2024 10:12
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants