[BUG] redundant code in moead.cpp

[leonwittemund]

The report is more an improvement rather than a bug.
In moead.cpp the lines 246-248 are redundant to 249.

Both statements update the ideal point by computing the minimum of the old fitness and the new fitness values. So you should decide for one solution.

If both statements were not redundant, it would be nice to explain why they are necessary.

[bluescarni]

Thanks for spotting this @leonwittemund .

I talked to @darioizzo (the original author of the code) and he agrees this was probably an oversight. I'll push him to open a PR when he comes back from vacations :)

[leonwittemund]

No problem @bluescarni.
Thank you for your answer ;).

I am closing this issue because I think it will be fixed soon.