Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Scalable iPerf server for Public use #380

Closed
pjebs opened this issue Mar 7, 2016 · 2 comments
Closed

Scalable iPerf server for Public use #380

pjebs opened this issue Mar 7, 2016 · 2 comments

Comments

@pjebs
Copy link

pjebs commented Mar 7, 2016

I have created a scalable iPerf server. Feel free to use it. Multiple people can connect to it simulataneously.
UDP mode doesn't work. I'm pretty sure that it's due to iPerf and not the server.
Give me feedback on how it performs. Each test must be completed in maximum 60 seconds so make sure you set a time limit.

Step 1:
Make a GET request to this url (via curl etc for example):
You'll need to provide these Request Headers:
X-Auth-Key: abc
X-Auth-Secret: abc

https://104.131.128.139/tcp or https://104.131.128.139/udp

Step 2:
You will get a response like this:
{
"ip_address": "104.131.128.139",
"port": 33999,
"protocol": "tcp",
"scale": true
}

Step 3:
Use the "ip_address" and "port" field to perform your iperf3 test.

@pjebs pjebs changed the title Scalable iPerf server Scalable iPerf server for Public use Mar 9, 2016
@bmah888
Copy link
Contributor

bmah888 commented Jun 7, 2017

So...does this service still exist? This probably should be an announcement on the mailing lists, not the issue tracker.

@wispernet
Copy link

wispernet commented Oct 29, 2018

So...does this service still exist? This probably should be an announcement on the mailing lists, not the issue tracker.

104.131.128.139 - host is not available.
Found other working public iperf servers here.

@pjebs pjebs closed this as completed Oct 29, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants