You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This is something I have spotted for a long time (and can potentially flood user notifications). The configuration for the robustness tests workflow asks for a runner that regular users don't have access to (and it's also trying to run the tests on actuated ARM64 runners, which regular users don't have access to).
We should run these tests only for the etcd-io/etcd (and etcd-io/bbolt) repository, as we have configured other runners.
Note I know that the plan is to eventually relocate all Robustness tests to the Prow infrastructure, but in the meantime, it floods with notifications, which decreases the contributor experience.
Why is this needed?
To save users from receiving notifications that jobs are failing due to timeout trying to secure a runner to do the job. Improve ContribEx.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
What would you like to be added?
This is something I have spotted for a long time (and can potentially flood user notifications). The configuration for the robustness tests workflow asks for a runner that regular users don't have access to (and it's also trying to run the tests on actuated ARM64 runners, which regular users don't have access to).
We should run these tests only for the
etcd-io/etcd
(andetcd-io/bbolt
) repository, as we have configured other runners.Note I know that the plan is to eventually relocate all Robustness tests to the Prow infrastructure, but in the meantime, it floods with notifications, which decreases the contributor experience.
Why is this needed?
To save users from receiving notifications that jobs are failing due to timeout trying to secure a runner to do the job. Improve ContribEx.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: