You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
To make sure that I am running the code properly, I am trying to reproduce some of the paper results. What's the correspondence between the results returned by the code and those reported in the paper? My understanding is as follows:
The values reported in Table 1 of the paper should be similar to np.mean(acc_test).
The values reported in Table 2 of the paper correspond to what in the code is called "mse". More precisely, in the code there are two similar variables referring to "mse" for test: mse_test and mean_mse. My understanding is that np.mean(mse_test) should be similar to the first column of Table 2 (because a prediction step of 1 is being used, see line 323 of train.py), and np.mean(mean_mse) should be similar to the third column of Table 2 (because a prediction step of 20 is being used, see line 351 of train.py).
Is this correct? Thank you!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi, thanks for the the code release.
To make sure that I am running the code properly, I am trying to reproduce some of the paper results. What's the correspondence between the results returned by the code and those reported in the paper? My understanding is as follows:
np.mean(acc_test)
.mse_test
andmean_mse
. My understanding is thatnp.mean(mse_test)
should be similar to the first column of Table 2 (because a prediction step of 1 is being used, see line 323 of train.py), andnp.mean(mean_mse)
should be similar to the third column of Table 2 (because a prediction step of 20 is being used, see line 351 of train.py).Is this correct? Thank you!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: