Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Yul] Use map join algorithm for performance. #5333

Merged
merged 2 commits into from Nov 13, 2018
Merged

Conversation

chriseth
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@leonardoalt
Copy link
Member

Test failing

@@ -0,0 +1,623 @@
{
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Not really sure how to review this file...

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The point of fullSuite is not necessarily correctness (that is tested in the individual steps) but rather checking that the result does not miss any optimizations.

@chriseth
Copy link
Contributor Author

chriseth commented Nov 7, 2018

Updated.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 8, 2018

Codecov Report

Merging #5333 into develop will increase coverage by 0.01%.
The diff coverage is 96.66%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop    #5333      +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage     88.1%   88.12%   +0.01%     
===========================================
  Files          323      323              
  Lines        32615    32630      +15     
  Branches      3869     3869              
===========================================
+ Hits         28737    28756      +19     
+ Misses        2581     2580       -1     
+ Partials      1297     1294       -3
Flag Coverage Δ
#all 88.12% <96.66%> (+0.01%) ⬆️
#syntax 28.13% <0%> (-0.02%) ⬇️

@chriseth
Copy link
Contributor Author

chriseth commented Nov 8, 2018

Updated.

{
for (auto& var: _other.m_assignments)
if (m_assignments.count(var.first))
// TODO Perhaps it is better to just created a sorted list
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Small typo here created -> create

leonardoalt
leonardoalt previously approved these changes Nov 12, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants