Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Date format could be clearer #6

Open
Evande1 opened this issue Nov 11, 2022 · 1 comment
Open

Date format could be clearer #6

Evande1 opened this issue Nov 11, 2022 · 1 comment

Comments

@Evande1
Copy link
Owner

Evande1 commented Nov 11, 2022

  • Not able to key in dates in upper or lower casing. (e.g. oct, FEB)

  • 0000-00-00 is an invalid input

  • Would be clearer to state in UG what months MMM contain.

Screenshot 2022-11-11 at 4.50.40 PM.png

Screenshot 2022-11-11 at 4.49.41 PM.png

Screenshot 2022-11-11 at 4.49.47 PM.png

@nus-pe-script
Copy link

nus-pe-script commented Nov 14, 2022

Team's Response

There are multiple bugs reported in this issue.

Not able to key in dates in upper or lower casing. (e.g. oct, FEB)

This is not a feature mentioned in either our User Guide or application.

0000-00-00 is an invalid input

There is no month 0 or day 0. This behavior is thus expected.

Would be clearer to state in UG what months MMM contain.

An example was provided in our UG on what MMM is supposed to mean. However, we did not specify clearly that the date must be in pascal case format.

image.png

In all 3 examples provided by the bug report, the date is either invalid or does not follow the date format specified, but the error messages are correct in all cases. However, because we could be clearer on the last point, we accept this bug, but believe this bug to be a documentation bug, rather than a functionality bug.

Items for the Tester to Verify

❓ Issue type

Team chose [type.DocumentationBug]
Originally [type.FunctionalityBug]

  • I disagree

Reason for disagreement: [replace this with your explanation]


Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants