Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature request: Use players instead of teams #293

Closed
klikr opened this issue Oct 5, 2023 · 3 comments
Closed

Feature request: Use players instead of teams #293

klikr opened this issue Oct 5, 2023 · 3 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@klikr
Copy link

klikr commented Oct 5, 2023

Teams are actually an abstraction level too much. It could be optional.

@evroon
Copy link
Owner

evroon commented Oct 6, 2023

Wouldn't the players layer be one too much instead of teams then?
Making one of the two optional would be interesting, I don't really know how to do that yet though.
We use teams and players for my club, so I will have to leave them in the system.

@klikr
Copy link
Author

klikr commented Oct 6, 2023

Hm, that depends on what can be used for assigning matches, programmatically. if in this case the teams are the entities that compete, then yes. If you could make it so that players could compete, independantly from a team, it would be great. Otherwise we would need to create a team for each player...

@evroon evroon added the enhancement New feature or request label Oct 13, 2023
@evroon
Copy link
Owner

evroon commented Dec 2, 2023

Now (since #365) it's possible to just ignore players (so don't add players), and add only teams. Then every team is what you would consider a player.

You can also choose to show team names, not player names now in the scheduling page.

@evroon evroon closed this as completed Dec 6, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants