Fee calculation unit

[ncying]

1. add fee calculation unit data/data field
2. set the unit to 0 in block
3. add fee calculation unit to block head

current block information in API:

{
  "version": 2,
  "timestamp": 1531983355004866800,
  "reference": "3jopEY9eGvAMjcipuucC3747RmHCnX6wQCHSjx5sXKvgA3GU58iAcBZrL2RhhwUXMJkaCHCXgwB15KgsMh6bJe2o",
  "spos-consensus": {
    "mint-time": 1531983355000000000,
    "mint-balance": 5555173895,
    "generation-signature": "J8BotjQYQ8TmAYiQBSvNySqdRH3p7sXeNGTM1er36UXz"
  },
  "fee-calculation-unit": {
    "computational-unit": 0,
    "storage-unit": 0,
    "memory-storage-unit": 0,
    "random-io-unit": 0,
    "sequential-io-unit": 0
  },
  "TransactionMerkleRoot": "9xcEnZHzhnLDHqowmqpqDFnPm67V7mZVxfv3dsQGWgHv",
  "transactions": [
    {
      "type": 11,
      "id": "9aLuqWHocjWBGxDJySmqmQMfn7zaJ5yYQrMGX6yS2fWy",
      "sender": "3N4SMepbKXPRADdjfUwNYKdcZdMoVJGXQP5",
      "senderPublicKey": "F2kBqJzCHut3k1EWqMb51CLYiUio9C6JSAkeExHo8hKs",
      "fee": 100000,
      "timestamp": 1531983355004866800,
      "signature": "326BkmqR7tQnRbZ4HcwfSTruCJAHD9D7FHWVZzUSRe5KeNoReTVNhYFyY49ZLjy9M57PEkwNq1L75Q6zJpRV2sng",
      "minterPublicKey": "F2kBqJzCHut3k1EWqMb51CLYiUio9C6JSAkeExHo8hKs",
      "minterAddress": "3N4SMepbKXPRADdjfUwNYKdcZdMoVJGXQP5",
      "amount": 100000000,
      "currentBlockHeight": 10,
      "status": "Success",
      "feeCharged": 0
    }
  ],
  "generator": "3N4SMepbKXPRADdjfUwNYKdcZdMoVJGXQP5",
  "signature": "sj6gJ1HsAWfQwUd3gVBgBPvDHpmSDRyd6v2MMNbEbdQQptFE41JRwUDzB2ew6JFgdbKUj6XL9ZcsATs7HJDor1K",
  "fee": 100000,
  "blocksize": 440,
  "height": 10
}

[virtualeconomy]

@sunnyking what's the long term plan for these fields? do we only need it at block level (vs. txn level)?

[ncying]

minters can decide these units in each block. all tx fee in block can be calculated by these units. based on the real cost (linear combination of these unit), different txs will be charged in different tx fee. all tx fee will be destroyed (shared by the whole community). tx sender need to set the upper-bound tx fee of each tx (similar as gas)

[sunnyking]

These names would look better imo:
"resourcePricingData": {
"computation": 0,
"storage": 0,
"memory": 0,
"randomIO": 0,
"sequentialIO": 0
},
BTW I think the consensusData dump should also be printed in similar style so the block dump looks consistent stylewise. Although that should be cleaned up later in a separate request.

[sunnyking]

Imo it's better called ResourcePricingBlockData

[sunnyking]

computationUnitCost
storageUnitCost
memoryUnitCost
randomIOUnitCost
sequentialIOUnitCost

[ncying]

fixed

current block info:

{
  "version": 2,
  "timestamp": 1532058710000014000,
  "reference": "347kpi3T4aLf6NrZW5BgAyRntf4Qy3kDNZVu9vgaYC5kopatMNzvzk9Euk2AU9daSm4PHmkcoVQ1sKabDL3KVnMg",
  "SPOSConsensus": {
    "mintTime": 1532058710000000000,
    "mintBalance": 2995895498777,
    "generationSignature": "7CUU2KmZuNVPpqWDNnrzKAr5cMTBAZxLQbY8nELPByuL"
  },
  "resourcePricingData": {
    "computation": 0,
    "storage": 0,
    "memory": 0,
    "randomIO": 0,
    "sequentialIO": 0
  },
  "TransactionMerkleRoot": "GGj9oNfgq1VetUCx9t2kw5G3nQy3o4TP9b453ph1FS2B",
  "transactions": [
    {
      "type": 11,
      "id": "7YNVF3J8G8g4CK43gbT5eedBYvvmGwyAmQX4eWDGBDB7",
      "sender": "3N4SMepbKXPRADdjfUwNYKdcZdMoVJGXQP5",
      "senderPublicKey": "F2kBqJzCHut3k1EWqMb51CLYiUio9C6JSAkeExHo8hKs",
      "fee": 100000,
      "timestamp": 1532058710000014000,
      "signature": "59pJN5FeMjZi4WS3MCKJznS5xsZ6EAWpxEgWJ6RJ9iS39vEfe5i3gAc6Yh7vudccsKdhBoYi6yeS8XKq1WTApDLV",
      "minterPublicKey": "F2kBqJzCHut3k1EWqMb51CLYiUio9C6JSAkeExHo8hKs",
      "minterAddress": "3N4SMepbKXPRADdjfUwNYKdcZdMoVJGXQP5",
      "amount": 100000000,
      "currentBlockHeight": 4411,
      "status": "Success",
      "feeCharged": 0
    }
  ],
  "generator": "3N4SMepbKXPRADdjfUwNYKdcZdMoVJGXQP5",
  "signature": "h1Cz2v771zR6SZEfK5HKPmhwem9uMJyrvrbckmiuFyXuB1BL4jA3wkUfmCuP62o9PrZYXXsPsNpw2mTkBELQKYB",
  "fee": 100000,
  "blocksize": 440,
  "height": 4411
}