contentFor #422
Closed
contentFor #422
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
commented in the pull request. I think this sort of thing is great, but would love to get a express-contrib or express-extras repo going |
|
I'd be happy to rework it as an express-contrib (or even a connect-contrib with an express module). You start the repo and I'll be the first contributor :) |
|
will do thanks man |
This was referenced Oct 19, 2021
This pull request was closed.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I've added a dynamic helper called contentFor that can be used to pass content up through the view stack. I've found this feature invaluable in Rails. I toyed around with a few alternate syntaxes (see http://gist.github.com/565616) and settled on this one. Please let me know what you think. I'm happy to refine the idea.