-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 17
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
strange behavior of backward rule #30
Comments
This is indeed what EYE currently does. |
Because the conclusion of second rule is succeeds already so it would not assert again. Thank you ! I got it. |
A query would do what you want
This is because query rules don't assert their conclusions but give them as answers. |
Thank you! |
I’m confused by the behavior of backward rule.
this example:
Give me result:
:Alice :type2 :animal
not what I expected :
Why did the third rule fired while the second one did not ?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: