You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This issue is dedicated to the summary of a paper that I found recently(Fair Ranking with Noisy Protected Attributes)
It offers a new Fair Ranking framework and mathematically proves the guarantees mentioned in the paper. I took a more high-level approach in summarizing this time. 2022_NeurIPS_Fair Ranking With Noisy Protected Attributes.pdf
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
@Hamedloghmani
Thank you for the nice summary. Do you think we can apply it in our work? For instance, in our dblp or github dataset, we don't have gender info but we can infer it from some tools with degree of accuracy. If we consider the inaccuracies as noise, ...
This issue is dedicated to the summary of a paper that I found recently(Fair Ranking with Noisy Protected Attributes)
It offers a new Fair Ranking framework and mathematically proves the guarantees mentioned in the paper. I took a more high-level approach in summarizing this time.
2022_NeurIPS_Fair Ranking With Noisy Protected Attributes.pdf
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: